During the language arts class, which is passed in the computer lab, we took surveys on three sides of our personality. The first survey was on our moral. This showed us if we were mature, and our ideas on the relationship with what surround us is honest, and full of goodness, or evil and immature. The second survey showed us our ways of thinking. This will help when we grow up to become adults. It will help us in the drammatic and sifficult choice of the job. The third survey measured our memory. In this survey I found out that I have a horrible memory, but I have wonderful logic skills, and my luck is immense. I also found out that these two abilities can be used to remember. These surveys were interesting, amusing, and made you think about the soul that lays beneath the crust we call body. My thoughts were many, but they are not found in the introduction.
The first survey did not surprise me. It stated that my attitude towards moral issues is mature and adult. In grade 7 we had many debates, and within these discussions I found in myself the ability to analyze and defend both sides of an issue. This ability was unknown to me, but Mrs. Banar helped me develop it, until, towards the end of the year, she said I had achieved a great task, and that I was now ready to think of the world that surrounds me. These traits will help me in my future; they help you understand what people want, so you can give it to them, a useful skill in diplomacy. They may also help in the case of judging a situation without taking the wrong road, which judges have two frequently do. People have to understand what moral is, and then they have to respect it. For morality is justice.
The second survey surprised me. The survey's objective was to make you understand the way you think. In the site's opinion I was three types of thinkers. Firstly I was a linguistic thinker. This did not surprise me; I love to write, read, and analyze stories, and this was only a proof of my suspects. The survey stated that, if you are this type of thinker, you could become: a journalist, not bad, a librarian, they give too little money, a proof-reader and a translator, absolutely futile, I write, not correct works, or the poet, I like poetry, but I would never be a poet. I quickly excluded the possibility of choosing one of these carriers, I like to read and write stories, not articles, poems or translations.
The second thinker was the Interpersonal thinker. This type of thinker reflects my characteristics perfectly. I pass the majority of my time thinking. Also when I read, sometimes I notice that I had started thinking about something, and that my body was reading without the mind. I normally think of myself, of others. My mind travels in the books I read. I analyze people, create diplomatic accidents, in which I have to fight to convince people. This way of thinking can bring me to become: a politician, but he has too many responsibilities, a psychologist, and this is a work that interests me. I like to analyze the soul of people. Their way of thinking and reacting. Then I could have become: a nurse, which probably I will exclude, a counsellor, another interesting job, and the teacher. I would not like to become a teacher for the simple fact, that I would laugh all the time, creating a state of not seriousness in my class
The third type of thinker was the Intrapersonal thinker. I also pass a lot of time thinking of myself; of the good, and bad sides of me. This type of thinker proposed: the teacher and the psychologist, of which I already talked, the pilot, I can't understand why, child care workers, I would not like to run all day trying to catch babies, and the explorer. Adriano Livingstone. I do not like these carriers, and I came to the decision that the only two carriers that interest me are, the writer, and the psychologist.
The last test measured your memory. I do not have a good memory, I remember things using logic, and listening to what others say. The test went well only because of luck. I think that improving my memory is an impossible task. I can't remember to sign a test, when I had thought about it ten minutes before. I will have to accept my problem and balance it with my great intelligence.
I am sorry I wrote so much, but this topic interested me, and made me think of what I am and what I will be.
The first survey did not surprise me. It stated that my attitude towards moral issues is mature and adult. In grade 7 we had many debates, and within these discussions I found in myself the ability to analyze and defend both sides of an issue. This ability was unknown to me, but Mrs. Banar helped me develop it, until, towards the end of the year, she said I had achieved a great task, and that I was now ready to think of the world that surrounds me. These traits will help me in my future; they help you understand what people want, so you can give it to them, a useful skill in diplomacy. They may also help in the case of judging a situation without taking the wrong road, which judges have two frequently do. People have to understand what moral is, and then they have to respect it. For morality is justice.
The second survey surprised me. The survey's objective was to make you understand the way you think. In the site's opinion I was three types of thinkers. Firstly I was a linguistic thinker. This did not surprise me; I love to write, read, and analyze stories, and this was only a proof of my suspects. The survey stated that, if you are this type of thinker, you could become: a journalist, not bad, a librarian, they give too little money, a proof-reader and a translator, absolutely futile, I write, not correct works, or the poet, I like poetry, but I would never be a poet. I quickly excluded the possibility of choosing one of these carriers, I like to read and write stories, not articles, poems or translations.
The second thinker was the Interpersonal thinker. This type of thinker reflects my characteristics perfectly. I pass the majority of my time thinking. Also when I read, sometimes I notice that I had started thinking about something, and that my body was reading without the mind. I normally think of myself, of others. My mind travels in the books I read. I analyze people, create diplomatic accidents, in which I have to fight to convince people. This way of thinking can bring me to become: a politician, but he has too many responsibilities, a psychologist, and this is a work that interests me. I like to analyze the soul of people. Their way of thinking and reacting. Then I could have become: a nurse, which probably I will exclude, a counsellor, another interesting job, and the teacher. I would not like to become a teacher for the simple fact, that I would laugh all the time, creating a state of not seriousness in my class
The third type of thinker was the Intrapersonal thinker. I also pass a lot of time thinking of myself; of the good, and bad sides of me. This type of thinker proposed: the teacher and the psychologist, of which I already talked, the pilot, I can't understand why, child care workers, I would not like to run all day trying to catch babies, and the explorer. Adriano Livingstone. I do not like these carriers, and I came to the decision that the only two carriers that interest me are, the writer, and the psychologist.
The last test measured your memory. I do not have a good memory, I remember things using logic, and listening to what others say. The test went well only because of luck. I think that improving my memory is an impossible task. I can't remember to sign a test, when I had thought about it ten minutes before. I will have to accept my problem and balance it with my great intelligence.
I am sorry I wrote so much, but this topic interested me, and made me think of what I am and what I will be.
1 comment:
Fantastic application and analysis of "test" results! The only thing I fear is if a politician named Adriano comes to power... (just joking!) 10/10
Post a Comment